ttobe:

image

the drem„„,

onlylolgifs:

Accidentally hurting someone vs. accidentally hurting an animal

So…

whitepeoplesaidwhat:

be-blackstar:

mysharona1987:

First the cops said Mike Brown stole candy from a store. Then the store denied any such thing happened. Then the cops claimed Brown was trying to wrestle the gun from the cop in the car…despite the fact all the witnesses claim he was several feet away from the car and never near it.

IMO, by the time the Ferguson cops are done, they’ll have claimed Brown also shot Lincoln, JFK, Biggie and Tupac.

^Important.

image

Please stay woke, people

Every single Marvel Studios movie has centered around a presumably straight, white, male protagonist, even if white women (mostly love interests) and men of color (support roles) have played roles in the film. The franchise is a box office juggernaut and has a ton of movies on this list, but we’ve gotten two to three movies about each of the men on the Avengers and there’s yet to be a film about Black Widow.

Both of Marvel’s ensemble films—The Avengers and Guardians of the Galaxy—trimmed down the superhero teams for their film adaptations, and the women characters, save for one, were the first to be cut. Most moviegoers will never know that women of color and LGBTQ characters were cut from Guardians of the Galaxy, but audiences will get to relate to the talking raccoon and the talking tree.

the-goddamazon:

invisiblelad:

Perpetual reblogging.

LOL so much was said with so few lines.

cunt3r-parts:

jocknoir:

stormcloaca:

lokiarrty:

suckmypoppunk:

unshaped:

wasn’t expecting this

but arent you glad it hapened

its ears ITS EARS ITS EARS ITS EARS

floomph

oh my god

It’s so cute

cunt3r-parts:

jocknoir:

stormcloaca:

lokiarrty:

suckmypoppunk:

unshaped:

wasn’t expecting this

but arent you glad it hapened

its ears ITS EARS ITS EARS ITS EARS

floomph

oh my god

It’s so cute

thebeccabeast:

artemuscainpotato:

thehomestuckwhovian:

Anybody else remember this episode? In it, a female villain called Femme Fatale is stealing millions of dollars in Susan B. Anthony coins. Naturally, the Powerpuff Girls go to stop her. She then convinces them that men are all horrible because female superheroes aren’t as well known as male superheroes, even asking Blossom to name some to where her only answer is Wonder Woman.

They start acting bitter, refusing to do chores when the Professor asks and even telling the Mayor to save the town himself. Ms. Bellum and Ms. Keane talk to the girls and basically explain that being mean to guys won’t do anything and that isn’t the kind of message feminists should put out.

They proceed to beat up Femme Fatale while giving her a history lesson about Susan B. Anthony, the story where she voted and was found guilty because women couldn’t vote back then, but when the judge wanted to let her off easily because she was a woman, she forced them to take her to jail. The girls handle her and the lesson is that misandry will not stop misogny and we all should just respect each other.

And it fell on Tumblr’s deaf ears.

I don’t usually engage with much beyond silliness on this blog, but..,

I just.. Okay, I just wanted to say the reason  this episode was able to function in a somewhat narratively sound way was that it was a story told in the context of the Powerpuff girls. What I mean is, the Villain character is a ridiculous representation of “feminism” in that she is so utterly the dangerous nonsensical man hating Straw Feminist trope, that obviously her methods and ultimate goal are going to be suspect and illogical. 

But at the same time, despite her character speaking truths that sour the girls, she isn’t the real villain of the story. In a lot of ways, the powerpuff girls become the villains, in that their new discontent with gender inequalities causes them to go beyond simply refusing to do things and being “mean”. They don’t hurt feelings, they legitimate threaten and bully and are lax in their duties (to save the city) putting others in harms way because they are mad — so in the end, when given the speech by the two other, “more reasonable” women on the show, and their final message of equality on all things where FF is shown to be a hypocrite and a joke, well it is a speech that seems applicable. 

And it is. On the Powerpuff Girls. Because in the context of this show, these girls are literal super heroes who live in an idealistic — often simple, and strange — city, with strength and abilities that make their behavior actually dangerous. They bully their dear sweet Father who cowers before them, the dopey yet lovable mayor, a boy on the school yard. They are obviously over reacting, right? It certainly seems this way, when super humans turn physically cruel to the poor men in their lives who are shown by the script as harmless and in no way at fault, and when their anger has the very serious consequence of putting the city in danger because in this cartoon world, they have that sort of power. 

Which is why I just.. well, I don’t agree with the crux of this post? Obviously vindictive, vitriolic misandry is an unlikely way to find resolution with misogyny. But I really wish that a show that is usually pretty awesome for young girls wouldn’t straight up frame it as being exactly the same thing? Because y’know, despite a smattering of cases, the most harm to come out of real world misandry is hurt feelings and bitterness; whereas, time and again real world misogyny leads to real acts of violence, sexual violence, death, unsafe environments (not to mention the inherent issues  of living in a cultural context where the systems of law are still, in many ways, stacked against women. See healthcare/reproductive care, consistent violence and oppression of trans individuals for moving outside of preconceived norms and the lack of recourse or action taken against this, the wage gap, the violence of the pornography industry, comodification of female parts etc etc etc). And yes, we should try to be respectful of each other, and the best way to solve problems is to try to find common ground. But telling young girls not to be angry over injustice, to be respectful and accommodating in the face of wrongs or in the face of oppression or in the face of violence or invalidation. I have a problem with that. 

To construct a laughable Straw Feminist, and then have two other “less angry, more reasonable, somehow more respectable?” women take these young girls aside and tell them, calm down girls you’re making people uncomfortable and your feelings are going to ruin it for the rest of us. 

Wow. No wonder it fell on deaf ears.

the-asexual-emperor:

squeaky-fangirl:

darning-socks:

((The ability to appreciate and evaluate human aesthetic is not determined by your sexuality))

THANK YOU

Reblogging at the speed of light

image

wow he sure is hungry

image

no no that’s just the way all kids eat cereal these days — face first

image

i’m hip

image

paulsrockinpagoda:

noswellicus:

Yesssss

nooooooooooooo

paulsrockinpagoda:

noswellicus:

Yesssss

nooooooooooooo

codyaferg:

wow-suchbree-veryblog:

"If white people are so privileged why is there a Black Entertainment Network and no White Entertainment Network?"

"Men don’t have privilege, there are women’s only gyms!"

"Why isn’t there a campus centre for straight/cis people!?"

SAME REASONS WHY IN MARIO KART YOU DON’T GET BLUE SHELLS OR LIGHTNING BOLTS WHEN YOU’RE ALREADY IN FIRST PLACE, ASSBAG.

This is honestly the best explanation I have ever seen.

I am so sorry that there are people in this world that love to pick at your scabs and then wonder why you are still bleeding.

deadpoetsinc (via starlingwings)

relevant

(via helenaisis)

lightandwinged:

dcu:

comicsalliance:

WHY SO SERIOUS: WARNER BROS. REPORTEDLY ORDERS ‘NO JOKES’ IN NEW DC COMICS MOVIES
By Matt D. Wilson
Comics fans have become well acquainted with the notion that sometimes, creative people learn the wrong things from successes. It’s why certain comics have been dominated for going on 30 years by a “dark” and “mature” sensibility that often comes off as grim, self-serious and overcooked.
Well, get ready for that way of thinking to make its way to movie theaters very soon. According to a report at Hitfix, Warner Bros. has a strict rule for its upcoming DC Comics movies: “No jokes.”
What’s particularly surprising is that the rule — which itself is kind of a joke, when you think about it — is that it stems from a failure more than it does a success, at least, according to Hitfix writer Drew McWeeny’s thinking.
READ MORE

So is anyone else ready to watch the joy and fun be sucked out of their favorite characters on the big screen? Or do you like the initiative WB is taking because frivolity is for babies?
I guess you can see my position from reading the question.

Imma need someone to photoshop the Warner Bros. logo onto the No Fun robot, please?

lightandwinged:

dcu:

comicsalliance:

WHY SO SERIOUS: WARNER BROS. REPORTEDLY ORDERS ‘NO JOKES’ IN NEW DC COMICS MOVIES

By Matt D. Wilson

Comics fans have become well acquainted with the notion that sometimes, creative people learn the wrong things from successes. It’s why certain comics have been dominated for going on 30 years by a “dark” and “mature” sensibility that often comes off as grim, self-serious and overcooked.

Well, get ready for that way of thinking to make its way to movie theaters very soon. According to a report at Hitfix, Warner Bros. has a strict rule for its upcoming DC Comics movies: “No jokes.”

What’s particularly surprising is that the rule — which itself is kind of a joke, when you think about it — is that it stems from a failure more than it does a success, at least, according to Hitfix writer Drew McWeeny’s thinking.


READ MORE

So is anyone else ready to watch the joy and fun be sucked out of their favorite characters on the big screen? Or do you like the initiative WB is taking because frivolity is for babies?

I guess you can see my position from reading the question.

Imma need someone to photoshop the Warner Bros. logo onto the No Fun robot, please?